External Independent Review Reports
ANAO Performance Audit of the Administration of the gift from CSIRO
In July-December 2015 the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) undertook a performance audit to assess the effectiveness of the administration of CSIRO’s Gift to the Fund. As required by the Auditor-General Act 1997, the ANAO report was tabled in the Parliament (February 2-16) and a copy of the audit was provided to the Minister for Industry Innovation and Science.
The report concluded that CSIRO’s Gift to the Fund has generally been well administered. In particular, the approach to designing the arrangements for managing the Gift was sound. These arrangements, including the processes for administering financial assistance from the Gift, have been operating as intended. Suggestions made for potential improvement of future operations have been considered, including undertaking a formal evaluation (the SIEF Impact Review – see below).
Read the ANAO report here [external link].
SIEF Impact Review
In the ANAO report (above), suggestions for improvement of the Fund included a formal evaluation to develop more qualitative and outcome-focused performance measures. As a result, the SIEF Impact Review was commissioned by the Trustee during 2016 and was conducted by the CSIRO Impact Team with independent consulting firm Acil Allen.
The Review evaluated the impact and value delivered by the SIEF Portfolio of activities to the Australian science and innovation systems. The multi-stage Review found overall positive findings, including indicating that SIEF has:
- Invested in strategic research that is anticipated to result in significant return on the Australian community
- Supported excellent science as illustrated by the quantity and quality of research publications
- Helped build capacity and capability in the National Innovation System through support of early career researchers and co-investment in major national research infrastructure.
To view more about our impact case studies, visit ‘What has been Funded‘.
SIEF commissions from time to time case studies for its annual reporting requirements and ongoing review of its impact on the National Innovation System.
In 2019 case studies were commissioned for two Experimental Development Program projects.